M. J. Maddox, PhD is the American English Doctor.  
 

Subscribe 

Ineffective Reading Instruction Still the Order of the Day

Why Johnny Can't Read

State governments could save a lot of money if all parents, teachers, and administrators would read this book and take it to heart.

On January 26, 2018, with much rhetorical fanfare, the governor of Arkansas and his state’s Department of Education announced R.I.S.E. (Reading Initiative for Student Excellence).

According to the press release from the governor’s office, the RISE campaign will “enhance and expand existing efforts by the Arkansas Department of Education and school districts to support literacy in schools.”

Results from the 2015 ACT Aspire test prompted the creation of this latest campaign.

Reminder: Initially, the Arkansas Board of Education voted 7-1 against switching from PARCC to ACT Aspire. After the governor appointed three new board members, the board voted 4-2 to make the change.

Thought by some supporters to be “easier” than PARCC, the ACT Aspire, administered to students in Grades 3-12, produced less than stellar results in reading. When tested in 2015,

48.6 percent of students in grades 3-10 were proficient in English language arts

39 percent of graduating seniors met reading readiness benchmarks

I have not seen copies of the tests. Maybe the reading selections were not well chosen. Diane Ravitch education historian and former Assistant Secretary of Education, doesn’t think much of the reading selections on either the ACT Aspire or the PARCC.

Whatever the reason, whatever the test, and no matter the state, about half the children who begin school in this country every year fail to become competent readers.

The governor’s announcement makes the usual promises and uses the usual jargon. The new campaign will “build a culture of reading” by “partnering” with “stakeholders.” It will provide support for “rigorous coursework.” by offering “literacy courses” in high school. It will provide “educators” with “in-depth information related to the science of reading.”

In short, the powers-that-be will continue to do what they have been doing for the past seven decades to ensure that half the population fails to learn to read.

Sixty-eight years ago, Rudolf Flesch shone a light on the ineffectiveness of a method of reading instruction that was leaving large numbers of American school children in a semi-literate state.

Flesch called the ineffective method the “word method.” Today it’s called “whole language.” It’s the method preferred in colleges of education and the method of choice in most of our public schools.

This is a method of beginning reading instruction that produces millions of incapable and reluctant readers every year. It’s a method that convinces children that reading is the most boring occupation imaginable by preventing them from reading books they would love at the age they would most enjoy them.

A method that is ineffective for half the children subjected to it is extremely profitable for publishers, reading specialists, consultants, and testing companies. It works rather like built-in obsolescence for consumer products: a beginning reading method of instruction that requires years of remediation for the children who can’t learn with it in Grades K-3.

Why Johnny Can’t Read (And What You Can Do About It) is still in print. Parents, teachers, and, perhaps, the governor, ought to read it—and take it to heart.

Parental Choice in Education

We’re in the midst of National School Choice Week, 2018. The only meaningful “parental choice” is the choice parents have to supplement their children’s education at home and to vote for politicians who are committed to a strong system of public education. […]