According to an article in the Daily Mail, in the light of dropping test scores in English, the government is urging a return to “traditional lessons.”
I’d say it was about time. For one thing, the headline for the story contains a grammatical error:
After 13 years of Labour, one in three primary pupils are still failing the 3Rs
That should be “one in three primary pupils is still failing…”
The article mentions a need to return to “synthetic phonics”. Nothing wrong with that. Synthetic phonics is more effective than the “incidental phonics” currently in use. However, I have to doubt that the writer understands much about phonics when I read:
The system [synthetic phonics] teaches pupils to recognise the sounds of individual letters, and then blends of letters such as “sh”, “th” and “ee”.
The phonograms “sh” and “th” are not “blends.” They do not represent the blended sounds of s+h or t+h. “Sh” and “th” represent sounds that have nothing to do with either t, h, or s. “Sh” represents the sound heard in shine, and fish. “Th” can represent two sounds, the /th/ in thin, and the /th/ in this.
A “blend” is something quite different. A blend combines the sounds represented by the letters in it. For example, “cr” is a blend that combines the hard sound of c with the sound of r as in crook.
Contrary to what the education writer says in the article, “ee” is not a blend either. It is an alternate spelling of the long e sound heard in such words as me, she, team, and see.
Too bad British educators had to copy the disastrous “progressive” practices that have contributed to the mental crippling of American school populations ever since Dick and Jane hit the textbook shelves in the 1930s.